| Kyle Walker Peters 14:22 - Mar 11 with 1656 views | SaintNick |
The best player in the side at the moment on current form, discuss |  |
| Satisfying The Bloodlust Of The Masses In Peacetime |
| |  |
| Kyle Walker Peters on 14:39 - Mar 11 with 1635 views | saints__fan__73 |
One of our best players all of last season.
Our best player in the pre-season.
As you say the best player recently and I can't remember him having a bad game.
The question is why he has so few starts at his position of RB.
The only reason I can think is we've been fattening up Livermento for the slaughter..... |  |
| |
| Kyle Walker Peters on 14:50 - Mar 11 with 1608 views | I_would |
Everyone, except Ralph, knows KWP is far better at RB. Tino has been out of form since his injury but inexplicably gets the RB nod. WP is knackered, plays as CB, not a good idea with his defensive skills, and takes corners when someone else should. That's our Ralphy for you. |  |
| |
| Kyle Walker Peters on 14:55 - Mar 11 with 1601 views | TimSaint |
| Kyle Walker Peters on 14:39 - Mar 11 by saints__fan__73 |
One of our best players all of last season.
Our best player in the pre-season.
As you say the best player recently and I can't remember him having a bad game.
The question is why he has so few starts at his position of RB.
The only reason I can think is we've been fattening up Livermento for the slaughter..... |
Numerous sources claim that Tino will be off to Spurs for £40m this summer, unless Man Utd come in for him. All probably just the usual idle media chat though.
Not sure how a transfer would work if Chelsea have a supposed Buy Back Clause until 2023 (Abramovich aside and assuming they have new owners by then). I thought the Clause meant that they would have first dibs. |  |
| |
| Kyle Walker Peters on 15:40 - Mar 11 with 1580 views | saints__fan__73 |
| Kyle Walker Peters on 14:55 - Mar 11 by TimSaint |
Numerous sources claim that Tino will be off to Spurs for £40m this summer, unless Man Utd come in for him. All probably just the usual idle media chat though.
Not sure how a transfer would work if Chelsea have a supposed Buy Back Clause until 2023 (Abramovich aside and assuming they have new owners by then). I thought the Clause meant that they would have first dibs. |
The buy back clause can be activated whenever Chelsea are willing to pay the specified amount.
But if they are unwilling, or perhaps more appropriately, unable to exercise it then we are free to sell to whomever we want.
I would imagine, given we already have a very good RB, that if Spurs offered £40m for him this Summer we would bite their hands off and shout from the rooftops that the club's player trading finance model is working. | |
| |
| Kyle Walker Peters on 16:20 - Mar 11 with 1552 views | A1079 |
I think he has been excellent since he became a consistent member of the first team. I was disappointed that he looked like he was being sidelined at the beginning of the season as he was one of our betters one last season as well. He always gives his all and just seems to love playing for us. At the moment he would be my player of the year/season. | | | |
| Kyle Walker Peters on 16:59 - Mar 11 with 1501 views | saints__fan__73 |
| Kyle Walker Peters on 16:20 - Mar 11 by A1079 |
I think he has been excellent since he became a consistent member of the first team. I was disappointed that he looked like he was being sidelined at the beginning of the season as he was one of our betters one last season as well. He always gives his all and just seems to love playing for us. At the moment he would be my player of the year/season. |
Agreed. Which is impressive as he's been marginalised / played out of position for a lot of the season. | |
| |
| Kyle Walker Peters on 10:24 - Mar 13 with 1258 views | Bettwsresident |
I agree. He is genuinely 2 footed though so can play on both sides. An invaluable asset for Saints. His ball control, tenacity and work rate are superb. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Kyle Walker Peters on 17:08 - Mar 13 with 1198 views | sledger |
only player playing with any hunger at the moment | | | |
| Kyle Walker Peters on 18:58 - Mar 13 with 1144 views | Berber |
| Kyle Walker Peters on 14:55 - Mar 11 by TimSaint |
Numerous sources claim that Tino will be off to Spurs for £40m this summer, unless Man Utd come in for him. All probably just the usual idle media chat though.
Not sure how a transfer would work if Chelsea have a supposed Buy Back Clause until 2023 (Abramovich aside and assuming they have new owners by then). I thought the Clause meant that they would have first dibs. |
If Chelsea are not in a position to enact the buyback clause, then there is no buyback. No different to if they decide not to take the option. |  |
| |
| Kyle Walker Peters on 23:17 - Mar 13 with 1080 views | darthvader |
| Kyle Walker Peters on 15:40 - Mar 11 by saints__fan__73 |
The buy back clause can be activated whenever Chelsea are willing to pay the specified amount.
But if they are unwilling, or perhaps more appropriately, unable to exercise it then we are free to sell to whomever we want.
I would imagine, given we already have a very good RB, that if Spurs offered £40m for him this Summer we would bite their hands off and shout from the rooftops that the club's player trading finance model is working. |
Take the money , then buy Broja with it . Kwp is better than Tino imo and id rather keep kwp on the right and Perr on the left . |  |
| |
| Kyle Walker Peters on 09:11 - Mar 14 with 1042 views | saints__fan__73 |
| Kyle Walker Peters on 23:17 - Mar 13 by darthvader |
Take the money , then buy Broja with it . Kwp is better than Tino imo and id rather keep kwp on the right and Perr on the left . |
I agree but either Chelsea will be forced to play Broja next season or else he will be sold for far more money than we can afford/get for Tino. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
