| Today's Formation 11:34 - Sep 11 with 5131 views | Darran |
Well according to several 'ITK' people we are playing a new formation today.
anyone heard anymore? |  |
| |  |
| Today's Formation on 14:33 - Sep 11 with 1392 views | TheKirkyLife |
I remain unconvinced about 3 CBs given our compliment of players upfront. Don't get me wrong I actually think it's a smart move as it gives Kingsley and Naughton a bit more attacking opportunity and will certainly suit the games of Llorente/Borja much better. Where do the likes of Montero/Siggy fit in though?
3-5-2 could work - especially with Borja fit. For Chelsea though as a possible formation.
Fabianski
Fernandez - Amat - Mawson/VDH
Naughton - Cork - Britton/Ki - Kingsley
Sigurdsson
Barrow - Llorente
Bench: Nordfeldt, Mawson/VDH, Rangel/Taylor, Britton/Ki, Fer, Montero, Borja/McBurnie |  | | |
| Today's Formation on 14:41 - Sep 11 with 1361 views | Highjack |
Would only really work if we played Barrow through the middle. |  |
| |
| Today's Formation on 14:43 - Sep 11 with 1354 views | magicdaps10 |
| Today's Formation on 14:41 - Sep 11 by Highjack |
Would only really work if we played Barrow through the middle. |
New formation or not, Barrow has to start. |  |
| |
| Today's Formation on 15:15 - Sep 11 with 1213 views | perchrockjack |
Well ,barrow doesnt |  |
| |
| Today's Formation on 15:26 - Sep 11 with 1142 views | FatherJack |
Indeed we seem to be going with a 5 at the back scenario with Naughton, Fernandez, Amat, Taylor and Kingsley all on the field. And neither of Montero or Barrow starting. |  |
| |
| Today's Formation on 15:30 - Sep 11 with 1106 views | Lord_Bony |
| Today's Formation on 15:26 - Sep 11 by FatherJack |
Indeed we seem to be going with a 5 at the back scenario with Naughton, Fernandez, Amat, Taylor and Kingsley all on the field. And neither of Montero or Barrow starting. |
It will look something like this...
 |  |
| |
| Today's Formation on 15:46 - Sep 11 with 1020 views | Brynmill_Jack |
| Today's Formation on 15:26 - Sep 11 by FatherJack |
Indeed we seem to be going with a 5 at the back scenario with Naughton, Fernandez, Amat, Taylor and Kingsley all on the field. And neither of Montero or Barrow starting. |
Plenty of options to change if necessary. Give the man a chance PRJ |  |
| Each time I go to Bedd - au........................ |
| |
| Today's Formation on 15:47 - Sep 11 with 1019 views | JackFish |
| Today's Formation on 15:26 - Sep 11 by FatherJack |
Indeed we seem to be going with a 5 at the back scenario with Naughton, Fernandez, Amat, Taylor and Kingsley all on the field. And neither of Montero or Barrow starting. |
So five at the back with some kind of diamond involving Ki, Cork, Fer and Siggy? I'm not convinced. |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Today's Formation on 15:50 - Sep 11 with 1003 views | perchrockjack |
Ok BJ.
I ll keep my comments private so it doesn't affect the ream | |
| |
| Today's Formation on 17:03 - Sep 11 with 883 views | Brynmill_Jack |
| Today's Formation on 15:50 - Sep 11 by perchrockjack |
Ok BJ.
I ll keep my comments private so it doesn't affect the ream |
We might get reamed anyway | |
| Each time I go to Bedd - au........................ |
| |
| Today's Formation on 19:21 - Sep 11 with 794 views | Swanjaxs |
| Today's Formation on 13:02 - Sep 11 by Swanjaxs |
3 at the back it is.... Amat, Fernández and Kingsley with Taylor and Naughton as wing backs.... you heard it here first ðŸ‘👠[Post edited 11 Sep 2016 13:03]
|
Well I did say dint I 👠ITK see me Daz 😉😉 |  |
| |
| Today's Formation on 20:02 - Sep 11 with 729 views | Highjack |
| Today's Formation on 14:41 - Sep 11 by Highjack |
Would only really work if we played Barrow through the middle. |
Called it. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.