By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Fcking hilarious. So the Clintons want disclosure and reasoning with information regards why the FBI have reopened the case. My thoughts went like this.
'Hello, police, can we help you ? 'Yes it's Fred West ' 'Hello Fred' 'Hello the police ' ' Am I being investigated for killing people, and if I am can I ask what evidence you have ? 'Certainly Fred, have you looked in your back garden recently and noticed a load of coppers digging up your patio' ? 'Oh bugger' .....
I'm pretty certain knowing that the dodgy fckr that is Clinton has already been under suspicion for tampering with evidence - they are hardly likely to tell her anything - least of all their lines of inquiry.
Fck me America is fckd. Let's hear it for the Statue of Liberty ....
[Post edited 30 Oct 2016 2:57]
Nolan sympathiser, clout expert, personal friend of Leigh Dineen, advocate and enforcer of porridge swallows.
The official inventor of the tit w@nk.
Clinton Email thingy on 14:03 - Oct 30 by blueytheblue
Yeah, I messed up the original post - meant "take the Utah polls"...
Wallace and Perot may have been formidable finished distant 3rd - would they have if up against Trump and Hillary?
I'd say the two main candidates you have are possible the two weakest to go head to head possibly ever. The default winner would by Clinton due to Trump being, well, Trump. I'd be surprised if some republicans wouldn't tactically vote for Hillary on the basis Trump would be a disaster.
I can see republicans would be far more comfortable backing McMullin than Trump. I'd say head to head with Hillary he's a far more credible candidate.
I might have a sneaky bet on him winning ;)
Wallace had no appeal outside the segregationist South, but someone like Perot could have probably won in 2016. I wish we had someone like that now. Anyone.
Wallace had no appeal outside the segregationist South, but someone like Perot could have probably won in 2016. I wish we had someone like that now. Anyone.
We might scoff in the uk ,but to see the "biggest" most influential country in the world with two such candidates is a real concern for the whole world.
Is this 'born in the USA' criteria 100% mandatory?
What about 3rd / 4th generation Americans who are born to parents working abroad, army for example. I think John McEnroe is in this category, is he ineligible (on place of birth I mean, not suitability other ways!!).
Clinton Email thingy on 14:28 - Oct 30 by exiledclaseboy
If Clinton wins she should appoint Trump Secretary of State, like Matt Santos did with Arnie Vinick. Imagine the fun to be had.
Comparing Trump with Arnie Vinick is like comparing Bartlet with Hillary :-)
Bartlet For America !!
It appears that these 'new emails' aren't actually new at all though but someone forwarding them to themselves. A strange thing for the FBI to miss. Almost as though someone has an agenda...
0
Clinton Email thingy on 14:39 - Oct 30 with 1150 views
Clinton Email thingy on 14:38 - Oct 30 by union_jack
Is this 'born in the USA' criteria 100% mandatory?
What about 3rd / 4th generation Americans who are born to parents working abroad, army for example. I think John McEnroe is in this category, is he ineligible (on place of birth I mean, not suitability other ways!!).
I think McCain was born in Panama.
Joe_bradshaw -I thought the cryochamber was the new name for Cardiff's stadium.
0
Clinton Email thingy on 14:39 - Oct 30 with 1150 views
Clinton Email thingy on 14:38 - Oct 30 by union_jack
Is this 'born in the USA' criteria 100% mandatory?
What about 3rd / 4th generation Americans who are born to parents working abroad, army for example. I think John McEnroe is in this category, is he ineligible (on place of birth I mean, not suitability other ways!!).
Clinton Email thingy on 14:38 - Oct 30 by union_jack
Is this 'born in the USA' criteria 100% mandatory?
What about 3rd / 4th generation Americans who are born to parents working abroad, army for example. I think John McEnroe is in this category, is he ineligible (on place of birth I mean, not suitability other ways!!).
US Army bases, wherever they are, are US sovereign territory.
[Post edited 30 Oct 2016 14:41]
An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it.
0
Clinton Email thingy on 14:41 - Oct 30 with 1140 views
Clinton Email thingy on 14:38 - Oct 30 by union_jack
Is this 'born in the USA' criteria 100% mandatory?
What about 3rd / 4th generation Americans who are born to parents working abroad, army for example. I think John McEnroe is in this category, is he ineligible (on place of birth I mean, not suitability other ways!!).
It's in the constitution. But those born on US army bases are eligible because those bases are considered to be US territory. Hence John McCain was eligible.
Clinton Email thingy on 14:41 - Oct 30 by Lohengrin
US Army bases, wherever they are, are US sovereign territory.
[Post edited 30 Oct 2016 14:41]
As are embassies, which I'm sure Ecuador was wishing weren't so someone could come and take Assange away, or at least make him have a wash and brush up.
Joe_bradshaw -I thought the cryochamber was the new name for Cardiff's stadium.
0
Clinton Email thingy on 14:43 - Oct 30 with 1132 views
Clinton Email thingy on 14:42 - Oct 30 by exiledclaseboy
It's in the constitution. But those born on US army bases are eligible because those bases are considered to be US territory. Hence John McCain was eligible.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
