Swans chose King over Markovic 17:07 - Jan 31 with 19962 views | magicdaps10 | Telegraph are reporting that we have decided to loan King over Markovic. Mmmmmm! | ![](/images/avatars/11389.gif) |
| | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Swans chose King over Markovic on 17:08 - Jan 31 with 7011 views | Whiterockin | Probably one would come and one wouldn't. | ![](/images/avatars/9155.gif) | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Swans chose King over Markovic on 17:11 - Jan 31 with 6916 views | max936 | Got to be down to money then as I think Liverpool wanted to sell him and not loan him, bit disappointed at this, King is neat and tidy enough, but he's not much of a goal threat. Watch him excel at it now | ![](/images/avatars/9760.gif) |
| ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Swans chose King over Markovic on 17:13 - Jan 31 with 6898 views | magicdaps10 |
Swans chose King over Markovic on 17:08 - Jan 31 by Whiterockin | Probably one would come and one wouldn't. |
Only allowed to loan one more playe from a domestic club, we have Abraham so could only loan one. By all accounts, deal for both was in place and was down to us to pick.......looks like we picked Andy King. | ![](/images/avatars/11389.gif) |
| ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Swans chose King over Markovic on 17:13 - Jan 31 with 6897 views | thornabyswan |
Swans chose King over Markovic on 17:08 - Jan 31 by Whiterockin | Probably one would come and one wouldn't. |
Read on a Liverpool site that a loan deal had been agreed with the clubs. Not sure why we need King or what he would add. But we have been linked before I think and Jenkins does like to keep going after the same old targets. | ![](/images/avatars/0.gif) |
| ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Swans chose King over Markovic on 17:14 - Jan 31 with 6875 views | magicdaps10 | Andy King is an absolute pointless signing. | ![](/images/avatars/11389.gif) |
| ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Swans chose King over Markovic on 17:16 - Jan 31 with 6839 views | jedmo_jack | Oh just fuk off Another terrible footballing decision if true | ![](/images/avatars/22409.gif) | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Swans chose King over Markovic on 17:16 - Jan 31 with 6837 views | Thornburyswan |
Swans chose King over Markovic on 17:14 - Jan 31 by magicdaps10 | Andy King is an absolute pointless signing. |
Agree, unless Carlos was given the call & picked him ahead of Markovic | ![](/images/avatars/0.gif) | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Swans chose King over Markovic on 17:18 - Jan 31 with 6786 views | max936 | Is this confirmed though? | ![](/images/avatars/9760.gif) |
| ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) | Login to get fewer ads
Swans chose King over Markovic on 17:19 - Jan 31 with 6759 views | Daggyjack |
Swans chose King over Markovic on 17:14 - Jan 31 by magicdaps10 | Andy King is an absolute pointless signing. |
Do we prefer Markovic to King due to our love of the foreign player? Not overly fussed with King but he's not a bad player at all. Also may add some bite and grit to our midfield and being 6 foot will add some height in there too. Would be happy with Ayew and King, if we sign a RB plus one more (but we won't). Shame about Schurrle. | ![](/images/avatars/9515.gif) | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Swans chose King over Markovic on 17:21 - Jan 31 with 6724 views | jedmo_jack |
Swans chose King over Markovic on 17:19 - Jan 31 by Daggyjack | Do we prefer Markovic to King due to our love of the foreign player? Not overly fussed with King but he's not a bad player at all. Also may add some bite and grit to our midfield and being 6 foot will add some height in there too. Would be happy with Ayew and King, if we sign a RB plus one more (but we won't). Shame about Schurrle. |
Markovic offers something totally different some much needed creativity and zip while King is more of the same, a holding midfielder. | ![](/images/avatars/22409.gif) | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Swans chose King over Markovic on 17:21 - Jan 31 with 6715 views | jedmo_jack | Agreement reached with Liverpool for Markovic Big news as far as the chase for Lazar Markovic is concerned. The Swans have reached an agreement with the Reds to take the Serbian on loan for the rest of the season, and it’s now down to them to close the deal. I saw the above though | ![](/images/avatars/22409.gif) | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Swans chose King over Markovic on 17:22 - Jan 31 with 6701 views | Griffting | Surprisingly not the most bizarre deadline day transfer we would have ever made. | ![](/images/avatars/9594.gif) | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Swans chose King over Markovic on 17:22 - Jan 31 with 6701 views | magicdaps10 |
Swans chose King over Markovic on 17:18 - Jan 31 by max936 | Is this confirmed though? |
Not confirmed but seems to be the word at present. | ![](/images/avatars/11389.gif) |
| ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Swans chose King over Markovic on 17:22 - Jan 31 with 6699 views | max936 |
Swans chose King over Markovic on 17:21 - Jan 31 by jedmo_jack | Markovic offers something totally different some much needed creativity and zip while King is more of the same, a holding midfielder. |
Ki off then I wonder? | ![](/images/avatars/9760.gif) |
| ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Swans chose King over Markovic on 17:24 - Jan 31 with 6654 views | magicdaps10 | I wouldnt class King as a holding player. I cant get my head around King coming here myself.....absolute pointless. Hope this one doesnt happen. | ![](/images/avatars/11389.gif) |
| ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Swans chose King over Markovic on 17:27 - Jan 31 with 6597 views | grfn | How is King better than Mesa? | ![](/images/avatars/0.gif) | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Swans chose King over Markovic on 17:29 - Jan 31 with 6541 views | jedmo_jack | Yep it's official, Andy King over Markovic from HJ, what an absolute joke. | ![](/images/avatars/22409.gif) | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Swans chose King over Markovic on 17:30 - Jan 31 with 6527 views | Neath_Jack | Oh Andy Andy! ðŸ‘ðŸ»ðŸ‘ðŸ»ðŸ‘ðŸ»ðŸ‘🻠| ![](/images/avatars/9278.gif) |
| ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Swans chose King over Markovic on 17:30 - Jan 31 with 6522 views | crix |
Swans chose King over Markovic on 17:24 - Jan 31 by magicdaps10 | I wouldnt class King as a holding player. I cant get my head around King coming here myself.....absolute pointless. Hope this one doesnt happen. |
huw speaking on ssn we are in for king just trying to get it completed ffs!!!!! | ![](/images/avatars/20014.gif) | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Swans chose King over Markovic on 17:30 - Jan 31 with 6504 views | Magic_Michu |
Swans chose King over Markovic on 17:27 - Jan 31 by grfn | How is King better than Mesa? |
King is the most uninspiring signing ever! From all the names we’ve been mentioned to be in for including Markovic... we go for ruddy Andy King. | ![](/images/avatars/8861.gif) |
| ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Swans chose King over Markovic on 17:30 - Jan 31 with 6501 views | Private_Partz |
Swans chose King over Markovic on 17:27 - Jan 31 by grfn | How is King better than Mesa? |
WOL saying Markovic loan deal has been agreed but we need to rubber stamp it.. Wolfsburg could not meet Liverpool's 15m valuation. | ![](/images/avatars/8905.gif) |
| You have mission in life to hold out your hand,
To help the other guy out,
Help your fellow man.
Stan Ridgway
|
| ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Swans chose King over Markovic on 17:31 - Jan 31 with 6481 views | Jango | Surely the fact we were in for markovic as well means we are still looking for another attacking player. | ![](/images/avatars/0.gif) | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Swans chose King over Markovic on 17:31 - Jan 31 with 6466 views | Porthcawlswan | Huw loves a sardine | ![](/images/avatars/0.gif) | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Swans chose King over Markovic on 17:32 - Jan 31 with 6444 views | mitchwales | Damnit! Jenkins has confirmed King on SSN. | ![](/images/avatars/0.gif) | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
| |