| Rupert Lowe 11:42 - Jan 27 with 3258 views | Boundy |
The man is like a dog with a bone, pity more who could do something about this scandal don't. He is determined to dig out all he regarding how our tax payers money is being spent on the people who shouldn't and have no right to be here.
Rupert Lowe
1h
·
I have been forensically digging through these asylum contracts, and one stands out to me. It is absolutely staggering. Please read on.
£1,593,535,200 for 'Provision of Bridging Accommodation and Travel Services’ awarded to ‘Corporate Travel Management (North) Limited’.
According to the official record, they’re based in Bradford…
Let’s dive into it.
It’s related to the Bibby Stockholm, housing illegal migrants on a barge off the coast of Dorset. Bradford is certainly a strange place to base such an enormous contract.
What is all of that money, OUR money, being spent on?
All this information is taken from official documents, labelled ‘sensitive’.
The illegals must be provided with a ‘varied daily menu’, taking into account all religious needs. If the illegal arrives late and missed the evening meal? They must be provided with a ‘light snack’.
What about cleaning? A ‘cleaning programme’ must be delivered to the standards set by the ‘British Institute of Cleaning Science’.
Routine cleaning must be provided, and their cabins are cleaned on a ‘twice weekly basis’.
A ‘house-keeping laundry service’ is included, with a maximum '48-hour turn around’'
Information on the local area is provided - including amenities and facilities. Illegals are assisted to make contact with a local GP surgery and dentist - they are assisted to do this.
The illegals are to be taken and returned from medical appointments.
A ‘programme of organised recreational activities' are provided, seven days a week. Activities available ‘morning, after, and evening each day’.
Full Wi-Fi coverage is required, with a bank of mobile phones available '24/7'.
Transport requests will be taken at short notice, all day every day. The transport must be ‘punctual’.
‘Adequate transport links’ must be provided to assist the illegals into the local area - and booking of transport services must be delivered for those ‘who wish to travel beyond the local area’.
Warnings against ‘unconscious bias’ are made, and it’s adamant that ‘the interests of the Service Users are best served.’
It goes on and on and on. Are you happy that your tax is being spent on these services for illegals? For transport? Recreational activities? Shipping them into local communities to roam the streets?
One of these illegal migrants was sentenced for sexually assaulting a teenage girl on a beach. There will be many, many, many others.
'Corporate Travel Management (North) Limited', based in Bradford, received this astronomical contract. A strange company name for such a service. What was the procurement process? How was this decided? I have put these questions to the Home Office, and I am demanding answers.
The Bradford firm was told on the 24th of February 2023 that they had been awarded this £1.5 billion contract, excluding VAT (with an extension option.)
Who was the Home Secretary at this time?
Reform’s Suella Braverman.
Who was the immigration minister at this time?
Reform’s Robert Jenrick.
They were the ministers, they were responsible.
I want to know exactly why these outrageous contracts were signed off.
It is scandalous. SO much more information on these contracts is redacted. I am going to find it...
We should not be caring for these illegals, we should not be housing them, we should not be accommodating them. We should be deporting them. On an industrial scale.
They are treated better than British citizens. FAR better.
It makes me sick.
The amount of OUR money that has been spent on these third world criminals by politicians (Reform, Conservative and Labour) is the biggest scandal of our time.
I will continue to use my position as an MP to uncover the truth.
|  |
| "In a free society, the State is the servant of the people—not the master." |
| |  |
| Rupert Lowe on 15:00 - Feb 5 with 174 views | onehunglow |
| Rupert Lowe on 14:20 - Feb 5 by Demitrius |
Gwyn you're defending the indefensible.
Your beloved Labour government have no intention of bringing this mass rape by their important Muslim block vote out into the open and the collateral damage and fallout it will bring to their institutions. There are no future trials or prosecutions to jeopardise.
They will kick this can down the road until 2029 until they are no longer in power and it becomes somebody else's problem. Same as the Tories before them albeit for differing reasons.
You have Jess Phillips the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Safeguarding and Violence Against Women and Girls rejecting a national inquiry.
You have Starmer's narrative that it's mostly far right propaganda and exaggerated lies when evidence clearly shows it isn't, blaming the Tories and doing f-all about it himself.
You have Saddiq Khan publicly saying he's never heard of rape gangs when clear evidence has been responded to by him personally and he's colluded with the Police to cover it all up. That is Taqiyya on an astounding level but you can see why so many are in the Labour party where barefaced lying and hypocrisy are the order of the day.
Anyone that believes that such a high profile Pakistani as Khan claims that he's never heard of grooming gangs as a phenomenon or as actual cases in London wants sectioning.
Lowe is giving these girls a voice where they had none before and showing the scope and size of this scandal and those involved in its cover up going back decades.
It's still going on because of a failure of political will.
Chris Wild, a care professional who works with vulnerable children in London, claimed the victims mentioned in the Met reports were just the tip of the iceberg.
After reading the case studies he said: “It’s happening all over London so much more than anywhere else in the country. I'm on the front line and workers like me all have stories of girls like this. I'm constantly vocal about this in London. To hear reports from the Mayor's office saying ‘but this is not a problem here’ show the guy's deluded. You've got to ask yourself the question: who are they protecting? What are they protecting?” [Post edited 5 Feb 15:48]
|
A quite brilliant critique
Being a loyal to one party voter is fraught with danger
Here ,working class(hate that word ) have been abused by exclusively Pakistani men whos culture clearly sees women as possessions and chattels
Its why they insist they cover upThey see white girls as trailer trash,little better than prositutes. Zero respect .
Islam has a lot to answer for ,as does Christianity and Judaism
Women have always been on the receiving end of religious fundamentalist nutters.
And welsh non conformism was little better
We are supposed to be a more open society now. My arse we are
LOWE is a beacon of light and people need to see beyond posh or public school or mega rich | |
| |
| Rupert Lowe on 16:52 - Feb 5 with 123 views | Gwyn737 |
| Rupert Lowe on 14:20 - Feb 5 by Demitrius |
Gwyn you're defending the indefensible.
Your beloved Labour government have no intention of bringing this mass rape by their important Muslim block vote out into the open and the collateral damage and fallout it will bring to their institutions. There are no future trials or prosecutions to jeopardise.
They will kick this can down the road until 2029 until they are no longer in power and it becomes somebody else's problem. Same as the Tories before them albeit for differing reasons.
You have Jess Phillips the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Safeguarding and Violence Against Women and Girls rejecting a national inquiry.
You have Starmer's narrative that it's mostly far right propaganda and exaggerated lies when evidence clearly shows it isn't, blaming the Tories and doing f-all about it himself.
You have Saddiq Khan publicly saying he's never heard of rape gangs when clear evidence has been responded to by him personally and he's colluded with the Police to cover it all up. That is Taqiyya on an astounding level but you can see why so many are in the Labour party where barefaced lying and hypocrisy are the order of the day.
Anyone that believes that such a high profile Pakistani as Khan claims that he's never heard of grooming gangs as a phenomenon or as actual cases in London wants sectioning.
Lowe is giving these girls a voice where they had none before and showing the scope and size of this scandal and those involved in its cover up going back decades.
It's still going on because of a failure of political will.
Chris Wild, a care professional who works with vulnerable children in London, claimed the victims mentioned in the Met reports were just the tip of the iceberg.
After reading the case studies he said: “It’s happening all over London so much more than anywhere else in the country. I'm on the front line and workers like me all have stories of girls like this. I'm constantly vocal about this in London. To hear reports from the Mayor's office saying ‘but this is not a problem here’ show the guy's deluded. You've got to ask yourself the question: who are they protecting? What are they protecting?” [Post edited 5 Feb 15:48]
|
I’m doing the polar opposite.
I want these insects and everyone correctly associated with them brought to justice with the full force of the law.
I’m desperate from them not to get off because their prosecution has been jeopardised by a powerless ‘court’ of public opinion.
Anyone who wants justice would want the same.
Anything else is letting heart rule head. Understandable but wrong nevertheless the less.
This is why it doesn’t appear in any accountable media (including GB news where it’s been suggested that Farage is protecting the worst scum on earth because he’s fallen out with Lowe).
Bizarre.
Of course, we did have a barrister on here who I think was either bored off by being constantly told he was wrong about the law or just plain fed up of his profession being slagged off.
Shame as he could have added a lot to this discussion. | | | |
| Rupert Lowe on 17:00 - Feb 5 with 114 views | Whiterockin |
| Rupert Lowe on 16:52 - Feb 5 by Gwyn737 |
I’m doing the polar opposite.
I want these insects and everyone correctly associated with them brought to justice with the full force of the law.
I’m desperate from them not to get off because their prosecution has been jeopardised by a powerless ‘court’ of public opinion.
Anyone who wants justice would want the same.
Anything else is letting heart rule head. Understandable but wrong nevertheless the less.
This is why it doesn’t appear in any accountable media (including GB news where it’s been suggested that Farage is protecting the worst scum on earth because he’s fallen out with Lowe).
Bizarre.
Of course, we did have a barrister on here who I think was either bored off by being constantly told he was wrong about the law or just plain fed up of his profession being slagged off.
Shame as he could have added a lot to this discussion. |
Or John could be a moderator, who knows. |  | | |
| Rupert Lowe on 17:42 - Feb 5 with 87 views | Gwyn737 |
| Rupert Lowe on 17:00 - Feb 5 by Whiterockin |
Or John could be a moderator, who knows. |
He certainly doesn’t post anymore, WR. | | | |
| Rupert Lowe on 17:48 - Feb 5 with 82 views | Whiterockin |
| Rupert Lowe on 17:42 - Feb 5 by Gwyn737 |
He certainly doesn’t post anymore, WR. |
He was an excellent, intelligent, impartial poster who stopped all of a sudden, I'm hoping he's a mod. Thats my crawling done.  | | | |
| Rupert Lowe on 18:26 - Feb 5 with 69 views | max936 |
The fact that Reform have now got the likes of Braverman and Jenrick should sound the alarm bells ringing to voters thinking of voting reform, Jenrick is about as honest as Billy Liar himself, plus he's all about himself the mans a shitbag. [Post edited 5 Feb 19:11]
|  |
| |
| Rupert Lowe on 18:34 - Feb 5 with 65 views | Whiterockin |
| Rupert Lowe on 18:26 - Feb 5 by max936 |
The fact that Reform have now got the likes of Braverman and Jenrick should sound the alarm bells ringing to voters thinking of voting reform, Jenrick is about as honest as Billy Liar himself, plus he's all about himself the mans a shitbag. [Post edited 5 Feb 19:11]
|
Or one could say they are getting ministerial experience into their ranks. It all depends if you are for or against Reform. | | | |
| Rupert Lowe on 18:47 - Feb 5 with 57 views | Gwyn737 |
| Rupert Lowe on 18:34 - Feb 5 by Whiterockin |
Or one could say they are getting ministerial experience into their ranks. It all depends if you are for or against Reform. |
I’m not sure if you want to reform to succeed in immigration, you’d want them to take on two failed tory immigration ministers. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Rupert Lowe on 19:06 - Feb 5 with 47 views | Whiterockin |
| Rupert Lowe on 18:47 - Feb 5 by Gwyn737 |
I’m not sure if you want to reform to succeed in immigration, you’d want them to take on two failed tory immigration ministers. |
Time will tell there's a couple of years to go, at this rate I can see Labour coming 4th in the next GE like the Senedd. | | | |
| Rupert Lowe on 19:40 - Feb 5 with 35 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
What are Reform / Right winger like Lowe going to do about immigration ? What are the options? These are all inhumane and not my personal choice. The idea is to make UK not a very welcoming place.
a) Use the Royal Navy to turn the boats back. The is would cause concern regarding the physical welfare of the people in the boats. Would the Royal Navy be willing to do this? Australia might have done this and it could be legal.
b) Pick up the boat people and take them to an offshore Island for processing there. A channel Island perhaps. They woud sit there for months and after giving up hope decide to go home. The Falklands is a bit far. Italy used Lapadusa for this.
c) Allow the migrants to stay but remove all services paid for by the taxpayer such as NHS healthcare schooling transport. They would have the status of migrant worker in Saudi Arabia. No citizenship private health care etc. Special foreign worker terms and conditions. They would be required to log in with their whereabouts etc
d) Reinstall the Rwanda scheme and process in a 3rd country.
e) Place in camps and provide rock bottom services to the minimum requirement of refugee hospitality. Food shelter warmth. Military camps with no right to leave. Basic food with no provision for religious preferences.. One Reform candidate favoured tents (Ms Jenkins?) . This would not be comfortable and would be extremely boring. UK is currently being accused of making the migrant comfortable with free phones and travel cards. There would be occasional flareup with bad PR as seen in Greece.
As a Welsh person I do not have great concerns about too many migrants. The problem we have in the West is our children even those with no skills and qualifications are no longer willing to do hard physical or monotonous jobs for £11 per hour. Abattoirs, care homes, recycling centres, Amazon, hospitality.
40,000 people on boats . 5% for Wales 2000. Most go to Cardiff Newport and Swansea. Very few to NPT.
As a taxpayer I am funding UK free services NHS schooling transport. Many immigrants are a getting here and doing cash only jobs car washes barbers shops etc. Enjoying the service but not contributing to it with tax.
I believe the UK and French authorities have agreed an acceptable number. For some reason the was one month with no crossing. This may have been because the numbers had exceeded the agreed projection and the French had a little chat with the smugglers to go on holiday. Just a theory. Turks stopped migration like a stone once Mrs Merkel offered them a few billion. I believe the french know exactly who the smugglers are. They see their faces every day at the beach giving instructions on how the outboard motor works. [Post edited 5 Feb 19:51]
|  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
