Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Bonne Gone 16:31 - Jan 4 with 13447 viewsToast_R

Mutual termination.

Filed that one under : meh

Clearly a League One standard player much like Connor Washington and that Wheeler chap. One of these days we'll get one right but begs the question when QPR are scouting from the division below, what are they looking at in a striker, is it all done on statistics thesedays instead of someone's keen eye for what's required?

[Post edited 4 Jan 2023 16:38]
4
Bonne Gone on 17:47 - Jan 4 with 2833 viewsR_from_afar

I wish him all the best, it seemed to me to be a good signing at the time.

His departure should reduce Rangers' legal bills, as well as our wage bill: We won't have to deal with all those compensation claims from linos he has given RSI

"Things had started becoming increasingly desperate at Loftus Road but QPR have been handed a massive lifeline and the place has absolutely erupted. it's carnage. It's bedlam. It's 1-1."

2
Bonne Gone on 17:59 - Jan 4 with 2741 viewsPinnerPaul

Bonne Gone on 17:41 - Jan 4 by dmm

Don't all clubs sign players who don't make it?


Surely not?
0
Bonne Gone on 18:01 - Jan 4 with 2722 viewsDieByYourSide

Bonne Gone on 17:42 - Jan 4 by stanistheman

I agree. Bonne was not really given a proper chance and would have liked to see him get a run of games alongside Dykes. As you say, Dykes has struggled for goals from open play throughout his 2 and a half season yet nearly always plays. I would understand better if his presence up front resulted in goals from the other attackers like Willock, Chair, Roberts, Adomah, Armstrong and the central midfielders, but apart from the first two the others rarely score. Amos scored a few last season but that isn’t enough to warrant playing Dykes as a lone striker.

Good luck to Bonne wherever he goes and I suspect he will be scoring for them.


Is that not because Dykes actually offers something other than goals? Bonne on the other hand...

Poll: And it's hi ho

2
Bonne Gone on 18:03 - Jan 4 with 2714 viewsCamberleyR

Bonne Gone on 16:53 - Jan 4 by GaxZE

Conor Washington should've been what we wanted, but I suspect he wasn't scouted properly or utilised in the right way. Should we have picked him up now with this type of team he may have faired better.

Peterborough have a great track record with selling strikers for clubs like ours:

- Dwight Gayle
- Ivan Toney
- Britt Assombalonga
- Jack Marriott
- Siriki Dembélé
- Conor Washington
- Aaron McLean
- Craig Mackail-Smith

All of these had great goalscoring seasons with Posh and we happen to pick one of the two arguable duds.


Washington wasn't even a one season wonder, he was more like a two month wonder. He had an Agyemangesque purple patch where he got 13 goals in nearly as many games for Peterborough just before we signed him. The previous season for them he managed 13 in 44 games which was about his true level.

Poll: Which is the worst QPR team?

2
Bonne Gone on 18:21 - Jan 4 with 2634 viewsessextaxiboy

Bonne Gone on 16:55 - Jan 4 by QPREvo

Could possibly on his way to Leyton Orient. Reckon we will recall Kelman as well.


Why ? He has scored 4 in 22 in a League 2 side that is top of the league
2
Bonne Gone on 18:35 - Jan 4 with 2537 viewspaulparker

Bonne Gone on 17:42 - Jan 4 by stanistheman

I agree. Bonne was not really given a proper chance and would have liked to see him get a run of games alongside Dykes. As you say, Dykes has struggled for goals from open play throughout his 2 and a half season yet nearly always plays. I would understand better if his presence up front resulted in goals from the other attackers like Willock, Chair, Roberts, Adomah, Armstrong and the central midfielders, but apart from the first two the others rarely score. Amos scored a few last season but that isn’t enough to warrant playing Dykes as a lone striker.

Good luck to Bonne wherever he goes and I suspect he will be scoring for them.


Bonne was not really given a proper chance and would have liked to see him get a run of games alongside Dykes

This is a joke isn’t it ? Or is that you Macauley ?

We had to suffer countless games of missed sitters we these two , anyone remember that FA cup home game against Fulham ? Bonne is a pathetic player with zero football intelligence probably one of the worst strikers I’ve seen at the club and I am counting the likes of dean coney and Brett Angel
Another one to the list like Sylla, Yenni, Washington, Polter

And Bowles is onside, Swinburne has come rushing out of his goal , what can Bowles do here , onto the left foot no, on to the right foot That’s there that’s two, and that’s Bowles Brian Moore

-1
Bonne Gone on 18:39 - Jan 4 with 2518 views1JD

Bonne Gone on 17:02 - Jan 4 by BrianMcCarthy

No.

"Up to" 2 million, iirc, and unless those additional clauses were for bad haircuts then I doubt they were triggered.


The standard practice for most transfer fees are weighted at 80% for the fee and 20% for adds-ons.

So at around 1.6m for the fee, that’s still a lot of money wasted. Hopefully we didn’t pay any add-ons which were presumably appearance-related and hence the reluctance to use him latterly.
0
Bonne Gone on 18:41 - Jan 4 with 2494 viewsstanistheman

Bonne Gone on 18:35 - Jan 4 by paulparker

Bonne was not really given a proper chance and would have liked to see him get a run of games alongside Dykes

This is a joke isn’t it ? Or is that you Macauley ?

We had to suffer countless games of missed sitters we these two , anyone remember that FA cup home game against Fulham ? Bonne is a pathetic player with zero football intelligence probably one of the worst strikers I’ve seen at the club and I am counting the likes of dean coney and Brett Angel
Another one to the list like Sylla, Yenni, Washington, Polter


Your the one who is joking.
Bonne had that game and maybe one other alongside Dykes.
Also, in that cup game QPR created a number of chances and Dykes missed a 1 on 1 by a country mile. So if you are judging Bonne on that game then really Dykes should have gone a long time ago.

You also criticised Sylla and Polter yet both had better scoring records for QPR than Dykes .
3
Login to get fewer ads

Bonne Gone on 18:45 - Jan 4 with 2462 viewsLazyFan

Bonne Gone on 18:39 - Jan 4 by 1JD

The standard practice for most transfer fees are weighted at 80% for the fee and 20% for adds-ons.

So at around 1.6m for the fee, that’s still a lot of money wasted. Hopefully we didn’t pay any add-ons which were presumably appearance-related and hence the reluctance to use him latterly.


I am merely guessing but I suspect it was £1m if he did 45 games as we were the buying club and could call the shots with Bonne as no one else wanted him.

As for who scouted him, it could be the same who scouted Willock or Eze we don't know. Sometimes this happens.

What is good is that we have not thrashed this one into the ground as we did with Washout. We have cut our losses and moved on. Hopefully, we can use the money saved to loan to buy with a better forward.

zzzzzzzzzz

1
Bonne Gone on 18:46 - Jan 4 with 2462 viewsNorthernr

I mean, given we've worked through three managers during his time here, and throughout that period our big problem has been strikers, the fact he 'hasn't even been given a chance' would suggest he's not exactly tearing things apart in training does it? It's not in any manager's interest, or the club's, to have a striker they paid for sitting around doing nothing while we struggle up front. This might be one of those looks like a duck, quacks like a duck situations.
4
Bonne Gone on 18:53 - Jan 4 with 2429 viewspaulparker

Bonne Gone on 18:41 - Jan 4 by stanistheman

Your the one who is joking.
Bonne had that game and maybe one other alongside Dykes.
Also, in that cup game QPR created a number of chances and Dykes missed a 1 on 1 by a country mile. So if you are judging Bonne on that game then really Dykes should have gone a long time ago.

You also criticised Sylla and Polter yet both had better scoring records for QPR than Dykes .


Bonne waiting for his chance to shine


And Bowles is onside, Swinburne has come rushing out of his goal , what can Bowles do here , onto the left foot no, on to the right foot That’s there that’s two, and that’s Bowles Brian Moore

0
Bonne Gone on 18:56 - Jan 4 with 2408 viewsdistortR

Bonne Gone on 17:13 - Jan 4 by daveB

no, it was 2million if he scored loads of goals and we went up


Didn't that happen, though?
0
Bonne Gone on 19:00 - Jan 4 with 2370 viewsstanistheman

Bonne Gone on 18:46 - Jan 4 by Northernr

I mean, given we've worked through three managers during his time here, and throughout that period our big problem has been strikers, the fact he 'hasn't even been given a chance' would suggest he's not exactly tearing things apart in training does it? It's not in any manager's interest, or the club's, to have a striker they paid for sitting around doing nothing while we struggle up front. This might be one of those looks like a duck, quacks like a duck situations.


You could be right there but Beale played Bonne in the pre season friendlies and he scored goals. If he didn’t rate him he should have let him go during the window rather than keep him.

Bonne almost left before it closed but it was pulled as we couldn’t get any one else. However, to keep and pay his wages and not select him is madness to say the least.
0
Bonne Gone on 19:25 - Jan 4 with 2216 viewsnix

Bonne Gone on 19:00 - Jan 4 by stanistheman

You could be right there but Beale played Bonne in the pre season friendlies and he scored goals. If he didn’t rate him he should have let him go during the window rather than keep him.

Bonne almost left before it closed but it was pulled as we couldn’t get any one else. However, to keep and pay his wages and not select him is madness to say the least.


You can't just let someone go. You still have to pay their wages. I doubt anyone else would take him and pay what we're paying. Yet another manager doesn't rate him. If all three recent managers don't put him in the team, there's a good reason for that. I suspect it's also true that playing him would cost more in terms of increasing the transfer fee owed.

It's a shame we haven't managed to source a really good goal scorer. I don't think it's through lack of effort though. And Kelman, Bonne and Dykes were all players who'd scored goals in struggling teams so I get the rationale. And Dykes has been worth it in my view for his overall contribution to the team.
4
Bonne Gone on 19:26 - Jan 4 with 2207 viewsdistortR

Bonne Gone on 19:25 - Jan 4 by nix

You can't just let someone go. You still have to pay their wages. I doubt anyone else would take him and pay what we're paying. Yet another manager doesn't rate him. If all three recent managers don't put him in the team, there's a good reason for that. I suspect it's also true that playing him would cost more in terms of increasing the transfer fee owed.

It's a shame we haven't managed to source a really good goal scorer. I don't think it's through lack of effort though. And Kelman, Bonne and Dykes were all players who'd scored goals in struggling teams so I get the rationale. And Dykes has been worth it in my view for his overall contribution to the team.


I haven't given up on Kelman yet.
1
Bonne Gone on 19:27 - Jan 4 with 2194 viewsMrSheen

Do other teams’ fans hate their own players this much?
7
Bonne Gone on 19:28 - Jan 4 with 2172 viewsTGRRRSSS

He was on the radio when on loan at Ipswich - he made it quite clear he didn't want to go back to QPR, and probably didn't want to join in the first place.
2
Bonne Gone on 19:41 - Jan 4 with 2116 viewskensalriser

Somebody knows how much we paid for Bonne, but as the fee was undisclosed I doubt anyone here does. Highly doubt it was 2m though unless as was said there were extras for each offside flag.
[Post edited 4 Jan 2023 22:11]

Poll: QPR to finish 7th or Brentford to drop out of the top 6?

0
Bonne Gone on 19:44 - Jan 4 with 2099 viewskensalriser

Bonne Gone on 19:27 - Jan 4 by MrSheen

Do other teams’ fans hate their own players this much?


Yes. I lived in Ipswich as a kid and saw a few games there when Mick Mills was captain of a pretty good side. Lots of familiar negative comments and grumbles from the town faithful!

Poll: QPR to finish 7th or Brentford to drop out of the top 6?

0
Bonne Gone on 19:46 - Jan 4 with 2094 viewsThGrimRanger

what disappoints me was the Charlton fans on the forum that i checked when we signed Bonne were a combination of confused and amused by us paying well over £1 million for him.

there wasn’t one single addick out of the 20ish that commented that suggest he’d be missed. some comments were thank feck they didn’t sign such and such.

they went down that season if i remember right so we should’ve been cherry picking

TheGrimRanger

0
Bonne Gone on 19:47 - Jan 4 with 2085 viewsHayesender

I see Conner Wickham has decided not to extend his contract with Forest Green, and on the same day we release Bonne.

I hope I'm putting 2 and 2 together and coming up with bollox here

Poll: Shamima Beghum

0
Bonne Gone on 20:03 - Jan 4 with 2026 viewsstanistheman

Bonne Gone on 19:25 - Jan 4 by nix

You can't just let someone go. You still have to pay their wages. I doubt anyone else would take him and pay what we're paying. Yet another manager doesn't rate him. If all three recent managers don't put him in the team, there's a good reason for that. I suspect it's also true that playing him would cost more in terms of increasing the transfer fee owed.

It's a shame we haven't managed to source a really good goal scorer. I don't think it's through lack of effort though. And Kelman, Bonne and Dykes were all players who'd scored goals in struggling teams so I get the rationale. And Dykes has been worth it in my view for his overall contribution to the team.


I meant let him leave in the summer window instead of pulling out of the deal.
0
Bonne Gone on 20:08 - Jan 4 with 1992 viewsSonofpugwash

So farewell then Macauley Bonne.
Your name probably rhymes with something.
But I'm too disinterested to work it out.

Poll: Dykes - love him or hate him?

0
Bonne Gone on 21:21 - Jan 4 with 1783 viewscolinallcars

Gone but not forgotten.
Unlike Thomas who's forgotten but not gone.
No, not fair- Thomas is a bloody good trier.
1
Bonne Gone on 21:35 - Jan 4 with 1725 viewsdanehoop

Bonne Gone on 18:46 - Jan 4 by Northernr

I mean, given we've worked through three managers during his time here, and throughout that period our big problem has been strikers, the fact he 'hasn't even been given a chance' would suggest he's not exactly tearing things apart in training does it? It's not in any manager's interest, or the club's, to have a striker they paid for sitting around doing nothing while we struggle up front. This might be one of those looks like a duck, quacks like a duck situations.


Agree to an extent - unless of course it has been made clear to the manager at the time that if you do play him it will trigger a further payment that will come from the available transfer funding. That means you wont be able to sign someone that you might want instead, so please be very sure of him if you play him. That sort of conditionality is like to make every manager adverse to playing him one suspects.

Never knowingly understood

2
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© FansNetwork 2024